MATHEMATICAL PROCEDURAL FLUENCY OF STUDENTS IN SOLVING MATRIX PROBLEMS

  • I. Kristin Universitas Tanjungpura, Indonesia
  • Yulis Jamiah Universitas Tanjungpura, Indonesia
  • Dian Ahmad Universitas Tanjungpura, Indonesia
Keywords: Accurate; Efficient; Flexible; Procedural Fluency; Problem Solving

Abstract

Mathematical procedural fluency is the ability of students to perform procedures flexibly, efficiently, and accurately. This study aims to determine the mathematical procedural fluency of students in solving matrix problems in class XI at SMK Negeri 1 Pontianak. The method used in this research is a descriptive method with a case study approach. There are 25 students from class XI Accounting at SMK Negeri 1 Pontianak as the subjects. Data collection techniques include measurement through descriptive tests, direct communication in the form of interviews, and documentation. The results show that the mathematical procedural fluency of students in solving matrix problems is classified as moderate, with a percentage of 64%. The conclusion of this study indicates that the mathematical procedural fluency is fairly good in solving matrix problems, but still needs improvement through more effective learning strategies focused on developing procedural mathematical abilities.

Kelancaran procedural matematis merupakan kemampuan siswa dalam melakukan prosdur secara fleksibel, efisien dan akurat.  Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kelancaran prosedural matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah pada materi matriks kelas XI SMK Negeri 1 Pontianak. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian adalah metode deskriptif dengan pendekatan studi kasus.  Dalam penelitian ini ada 25 siswa dari kelas XI Akuntansi SMK Negeri 1 Pontianak sebagai subjeknya. Teknik pengumpulan data yaitu meliputi pengukuran melalui tes uraian, komunikasi langsung berupa wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kelancaran prosedural matematis siswa dalam pemecahan masalah khususnya pada materi matriks tergolong sedang dengan persentase 64 %.  Kesimpulan penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kelancaran procedural matematis yang cukup baik  dalam pemecahan masalah matriks namun masih perlu peningkatan melalui strategi pembelajaran yang lebih efektif dan terfokus pada pengembangan kemampuan prosedural matematis.

References

Anggita, N., Jamiah, Y., & Ahmad, D. (2017). Pemahaman konseptual dan kelancaran prosedural siswa dalam materi bentuk akar di kelas x sma. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa.[OnIine], 7(5), 8. https://doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v7i5.25790

Carolin, E., Hartono, Y., & Yukans, S. S. (2025). Procedural fluency of 10th-grade students on the spltv topic through discovery learning assisted by photomath. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 16(3), 545-558. https://doi.org/10.26877/3s366k66

Damayanti, E., Sugiatno, & Sayu, S. (2018). Kelancaran Prosedural Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Operasi Bentuk Aljabar di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 7(9). https://doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v7i9.28588

Fadzil, N. M., & Osman, S. (2025). Scoping the landscape: Comparative review of collaborative learning methods in mathematical problem-solving pedagogy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 20(2), em0820. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15935

Haryandika, U. W., Utami, C., & Prihatiningtyas, N. C. (2017). Analisis kelancaran prosedural matematis siswa pada materi persamaan eksponen kelas X SMANegeri 2 Singkawang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia, 2(2), 72-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jpmi.v2i2.226

Honra, J. R., & Monterola, S. L. C. (2025). Effects of biology design thinking, moderated by resilience, in enhancing cognitive flexibility. The Journal of Educational Research, 118(4), 376-385. https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/vjerxx/v118y2025i4p376-385.html

Inayah, S., Septian, A., & Suwarman, R. F. (2020). Student procedural fluency in numerical method subjects. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 3(1), 53-64. https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v3i1.5316

Jamiah, Y., & Pasaribu, R. L. (2023). Penguatan Kemampuan Problem Solving Mahasiswa Melalui Model Reaps. Journal Numeracy, 10(2), 52–64. https://ejournal.bbg.ac.id/numeracy

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping Childern Learn Mathematics. National Academy Press. https://www.fisme.science.uu.nl/publicaties/literatuur/2002_kilpatrick_swafford.pdf

Kusuma, H., & Masduki, M. (2016). How students solve the logarithm? Conceptual and procedural understanding. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 1(1), 56-68. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v1i1.1778

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., Rohidi, T. R., & Mulyarto. (1992). Analisis data kualitatif: buku sumber tentang metode metode baru. Penerbit Universitas Indonesia (UI-Press). https://psb.feb.ui.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=39945

Martin, K. S. (2025). Implementing productive practice in a grade 10 classroom for the development of procedural fluency in quadratic functions: a design-based research study (Doctoral dissertation, Universty of the Western Cape). https://hdl.handle.net/10566/20838

Ncube, M., & Luneta, K. (2025). Concept-based instruction: Improving learner performance in mathematics through conceptual understanding. Pythagoras-Journal of the Association for Mathematics Education of South Africa, 46(1), 815. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1469567.pdf

Oktaviani, N. N., Suprapto, P. K., & Mustofa, R. F. (2021). Hubungan Fleksibilitas Kognitif Dengan Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah Pada Mata Pelajaran Biologi Di MAN Kota Tasikmalaya. Jurnal Bioterdidik: Wahana Ekspresi Ilmiah, 9(1), 87–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jbt.v9i1.21745

Orakcı, Ş., & Khalili, T. (2025). The impact of cognitive flexibility on prospective EFL teachers' critical thinking disposition: the mediating role of self-efficacy. Cognitive Processing, 26(1), 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-024-01227-8

Pratidiana, D., & Muhayatun, N. (2021). Analisis kelancaran prosedural matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal program linear. UNION: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 189-201. https://doi.org/10.30738/union.v9i2.9369

Rahayuningsih, S., Sirajuddin, S., & Nasrun, N. (2020). Cognitive Flexibility: Exploring Students’ Problem-Solving in Elementary School Mathematics Learning. Jramathedu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 6(1). https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v6i1.11630

Rahmatiya, R., & Miatun, A. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Ditinjau dari Resiliensi Matematis Siswa SMP. Teorema: Teori dan Riset Matematika, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.25157/teorema.v5i2.3619

Sari, N., Yusmin, E., & Nursangaji, A. (2018). Kelancaran Prosedural Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Persamaan Kuadrat di Kelas X SMKN 2 Pontianak. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v7i2.23910

Sagita, D. K., Ermawati, D., & Riswari, L. A. (2023). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i2.4609

Siregar, N. F. (2019). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika. Logaritma: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Sains, 7(01). https://doi.org/10.24952/logaritma.v7i01.1660

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. CV ALFABETA.

Suharsimi, A. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Putra.

Suryani, M., Jufri, L. H., & Putri, T. A. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Berdasarkan Kemampuan Awal Matematika. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v9i1.605

Uras, M. C., Kaya, S., Kaya, A., & Yildirim, M. (2025). Unveiling risk profiles: A latent profile analysis of 21st‐century skills, resistance to change, and cognitive flexibility. Brain and Behavior, 15(1), e70167. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11706717/

Published
2026-03-14
Section
Articles