STUDENTS' ERRORS IN SOLVING JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS TKA QUESTIONS BASED ON NEWMAN'S THEORY
Abstract
Indonesia’s persistently low mathematical literacy scores on international and national assessments motivate closer scrutiny of how students actually fail when solving mathematics problems, yet few studies have examined error patterns on the newly implemented national Mathematics Academic Ability Test (TKA) in relation to mathematical literacy indicators specifically. This study aims to identify and describe the mistakes made by junior high school students in solving Mathematics TKA items using Newman’s Error Analysis (NEA), and to examine how the resulting error patterns relate to mathematical literacy processes. A qualitative descriptive design was employed, with data collected through a written test covering four TKA content domains and semi-structured interviews with students purposively selected to represent each error category. The subjects were 24 students of class VIII at a public junior high school in Jambi. No reading errors were found; comprehension and transformation errors each accounted for 47.92% of cases, and process skill errors were the most frequent at 77.08%, while encoding errors were 46,88%. These findings suggest that students’ primary difficulty lies not in reading or basic comprehension, but in formulating an appropriate mathematical model, carrying out multi-step procedures, and communicating a complete final answer, processes closely tied to the employing and interpreting components of mathematical literacy, although time constraints and the single-class scope of this study mean these patterns should be interpreted with caution. The findings suggest that classroom practice combining contextual, non-routine problem solving with explicit model-building and answer-checking routines may help reduce these errors.
Rendahnya capaian literasi matematika Indonesia pada asesmen internasional maupun nasional mendorong perlunya kajian lebih mendalam mengenai bagaimana siswa sesungguhnya mengalami kesalahan dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika, namun masih sedikit penelitian yang mengkaji pola kesalahan pada Tes Kemampuan Akademik (TKA) Matematika yang baru diterapkan dalam kaitannya dengan indikator literasi matematika secara spesifik. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi dan mendeskripsikan kesalahan siswa SMP dalam menyelesaikan soal TKA Matematika menggunakan Newman’s Error Analysis (NEA), serta mengkaji keterkaitan pola kesalahan tersebut dengan proses literasi matematika. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain deskriptif kualitatif, dengan data dihimpun melalui tes tertulis yang mencakup empat konten TKA dan wawancara semi terstruktur dengan siswa yang dipilih secara purposive untuk mewakili setiap kategori kesalahan. Subjek penelitian adalah 24 siswa kelas VIII di salah satu SMP Negeri Jambi. Tidak ditemukan kesalahan membaca; kesalahan memahami dan mentransformasi soal masing-masing tercatat sebesar 47,92%, sedangkan kesalahan keterampilan proses paling banyak ditemukan yaitu 77,08%, sementara kesalahan penulisan jawaban sebesar 46,88%. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa kesulitan utama siswa bukan terletak pada membaca atau pemahaman dasar, melainkan pada memformulasikan model matematika yang tepat, melaksanakan prosedur bertahap, dan mengomunikasikan jawaban akhir secara lengkap, proses yang berkaitan erat dengan komponen menggunakan dan menafsirkan dalam literasi matematika, meskipun keterbatasan waktu tes dan cakupan penelitian pada satu kelas berarti pola ini perlu dimaknai secara hati-hati. Temuan ini mengindikasikan bahwa praktik pembelajaran yang memadukan soal kontekstual non-rutin dengan pembiasaan membangun model matematika secara eksplisit dan meninjau jawaban dapat membantu mengurangi kesalahan tersebut.
References
Aditya, A. Y., &, & Hakiem, M. R. (2026). Developing creative thinking skills through strengthening prior knowledge in mathematical literacy. Journal of Creativity, Article 100126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2026.100126
Barbieri, C. A., & Booth, J. L. (2020). Mistakes on display: Incorrect examples refine equation solving and algebraic feature knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(4), 862–878. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3663
Burkhardt, H., Pead, D., & Stacey, K. (2024). Learning and teaching for mathematical literacy. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003303503
Carabregu-Vokshi, M., Ogruk-Maz, G., Yildirim, S., Dedaj, B., & Zeqiri, A. (2024). 21st Century digital skills of higher education students during Covid-19—is it possible to enhance digital skills of higher education students through E-Learning? Education and Information Technologies., 29(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12232-3
Citra, L. Y., Rahmawati, D., & Vahlia, I. (2022). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Logaritma Berdasarkan Newman Ditinjau Dari Gaya Berpikir Sekuensial Abstrak. EMTEKA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 206–218. https://doi.org/10.24127/emteka.v3i2.2442
Falani, I., & Sainuddin, S. (2026). Mathematical literacy assessment : a scalable mobile adaptive blueprint for mapping proficiency across PISA domains. Alphamath: Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(1), 281–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.30595/alphamath.v12i1.30279
Kemendikdasmen. (2025). Keputusan Kepala Badan Standar, Kurikulum, Dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah Nomor 059/H/M/2025 Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Penyelenggaraan Tes Kemampuan Akademik Bagi Pelaksana Tingkat Pusat, Daerah, Dan Satuan Pendidikan. Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2025 Nomor 463. https://tka.kemendikdasmen.go.id/
Kemendikdasmen. (2026). Hasil Capaian Nasional TKA Provinsi Jambi 2025. Diakses melalui https://tka.kemendikdasmen.go.id/
Kemendikdasmen. (2025). Keputusan menteri pendidikan dasar dan menengah republik indonesia nomor 95/m/2025 tentang Pedoman penyelenggaraan tes kemampuan akademik Menteri pendidikan dasar dan menengah republik indonesia. Diakses melalui https://tka.kemendikdasmen.go.id/
Kiraam, R., Nusantara, D. S., & Pasaribu, F. T. (2025). Student’s errors in solving PISA questions on space and shape. Journal Numeracy, 12(2), 149–162 https://ejournal.bbg.ac.id/numeracy
Mathaba, P. N., Bayaga, A., Tîrnovan, D., & Bossé, M. J. (2024). Error analysis in algebra learning : Exploring misconceptions and cognitive levels. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(2), 575–592. http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i2.pp575-592
Monika, I., & Sainuddin, S., & Junita, R. (2025). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal PISA konten space and shape berdasarkan teori Newman. De Fermat: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 897–909. https://doi.org/10.36277/defermat.v8i2.2387
Noutsara, S., Neunjhem, T., &, & Chemrutsame, W. (2021). Mistakes in mathematics problems solving based on newman’s error analysis on set materials. Journal La Edusci, 2(01), 20-27. 10.37899/journallaedusci.v2i1.367
Nusantara, D. S., Herlambang, S. B., Pasaribu, F. T., & Maphutha, K. (2026). Developing PISA-like task using climate change contexts to enhance s tudents ’ statistical literacy. JRAMathEdu, 11(2), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v11i2.15181
Nusantara, D. S., Zulkardi, & Putri, I. (2021). Designing PISA-like mathematics task using a covid-19 context (PISAcomat). Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(2), 349–364. http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.2.13181.349-364
Nusantara, D. S., Zulkardi, & Putri, R. I. I. (2025). Investigating students ’ mathematical argumentation ability in solving PISA-like mathematics tasks on change and relationships. Journal on Mathematics Education, 19(4), 807–826. https://doi.org/10.22342/mej.v19i4.pp807-826
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Result (Volume 1): Excellence and equity in education. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
OECD. (2018). PISA 2018 Result (Volume 1) : What Students Know and Can Do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results combined executive summaries volume I, II & III, I. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/Combined_Executive_Summaries_PISA_2018.pdf
OECD. (2023a). PISA 2022 assessment and analytical framework. Paris : OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/dfe0bf9c-en
OECD. (2023b). PISA 2022 Results The state of learning and equity in education (Vol. I). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Pereira, J., Aulingga, A., Ning, Y., & Vilela, A. (2022). Kesalahan siswa SMP dalam menyelesaikan soal PISA konten space and shape berdasarkan teori newman. JPMI: Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 5(2), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v5i2.317-326
Permendikdasmen. (2025). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Republik Indonesia (Kemendikdasmen) Nomor 9 Tahun 2025 tentang Tes Kemampuan Akademik. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kemendikdasmen. Diakses melalui https://tka.kemendikdasmen.go.id/
Prameshti, N, L., Darmawan, P., & Dejarlo, J. O. (2024). Analysis of students ’ errors in solving statistics problems based on Newman ’ s Error theory : a study on high school students. Polyhedron International Journal in Mathematics Education, 2(2), 56–63. https://nakiscience.com/index.php/pijme
Pranitasari, D & Ratu, N. (2020). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika PISA pada konten change and relationship. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(4), 1235–1248. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i4.2685
Purba, R. D., Aprilia, M., Sihombing, N. P., Sidabutar, P., & Siregar, B. H. (2025). Error analysis of class XII students of public high school 18 Medan in solving opportunity problems. EMTEKA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.24127/emteka.v6i1.7874
Ritanti, E., Winarni, S., & Kumalasari, A. (2025). Analysis of analysis of student errors through newman’s procedure based on jung’s personality type in solving math story problems. EMTEKA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.24127/emteka.v6i1.5904
Safegi, J. . D., Hiltrimartin, C., & Sukaryawan, M., Madang, K., Wiyono, K., & Anwar, Y. (2021). Kesalahan Siswa sekolah mnengah pertama dalam menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Tipe PISA. Inomatika, 3(2), 114–126. https://inomatika.unmuhbabel.ac.id/index.php
Shinariko, L.J, Saputri, N. W., Hartono, Y., & Araiku, J. (2020). Analysis of students ’ mistakes in solving mathematics olympiad problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1480(1),012039. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1480/1/012039
Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bHCoMxfSSEeNMOa89hRQTPxCEuJl9S7S/view?usp=drivesdk
Copyright (c) 2026 EMTEKA

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
EMTEKA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika provides open access to its content, promoting global knowledge exchange. All articles are freely available for reading and downloading. Under the CC-BY license, authors retain copyright but grant others permission to use the content, provided proper attribution is given. Users must cite the original source, including the author(s), EMTEKA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika as the publisher, publication year, volume, and DOI (if available).



