ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN METAKOGNITIF DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIS DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR HONEY-MUMFORD

  • Viona Yuliza Universitas Jambi
  • Nizlel Huda Universitas Jambi
  • Ranisa Junita Universitas Jambi

Abstract

This study was conducted to analyze the level of metacognitive ability in mathematical problem solving in terms of Honey-Mumford learning style in class XI students. This research uses descriptive qualitative research. The results obtained in this study through test data, Think aloud, and interviews that have been conducted by the eight subjects are found that the eight subjects are able to determine the information contained in the problem given. The eight subjects were also able to develop a solution plan, even making conclusions from the given solution steps. However, all eight subjects had weaknesses in re-examining the answers, and only some of the subjects were able to correct the mistakes made. Therefore, the conclusion that can be given in this study related to the level of metacognitive abilities in mathematical problem solving in terms of Honey-Mumford's learning style is that  and  subjects are at the Strategic use metacognitive ability level. While  and  subjects are at the Reflective use metacognitive ability level.

References

Aljaberi, N. M. (2015). University Student's Learning Styles and Their Ability to Solve Mathematical Problems. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(3), 121-134.

Anderson, N. J. (2002). The Role of Metacognition in Second Language Teaching and Learning. 1–4.

Fasha, A., Johar, R., & Ikhsan, M. (2018). Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa melalui Pendekatan Metakognitif. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 5(2), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v5i2.11995

Honey, P., Mumford, A. (1992). The Manual of Learning Styles. Berkshire Peter Honey. 1-88.

Huda, N., & Marsal, J. (2021). Exploring Student Metacognitive Failures Based on Red Flag in Mathematic Problem Solving: A Case Study in Mathematic Education Program. Proceedings of the 3rd Green Development International Conference (GDIC 2020), 205(Gdic 2020), 452–460. https://doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.210825.077

Laurens, T. (2010). Penjenjangan Metakognisi Siswa yang Valid dan Reliabilitas. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 17(2), 201–210.

Memnun, D. S., & Hart, L. C. (2012). Elementary School Mathematics Teacher Trainees Metacognitive Awareness Levels: Turkey Case. Journal of International Education Research (JIER), 8(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.19030/jier.v8i2.6837

Nafisyah, C. L., Zawawi, I., & Huda, S. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Peserta Didik Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Honey-Mumford. JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(1037–1048). http://repositori.unsil.ac.id/id/eprint/4018

Perni, N. N. (2018). Penerapan Teori Belajar Humanistik dalam Pembelajaran. Adi Widya: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.25078/aw.v3i2.889

Polya, G. (1973). How To Solve It – A New Aspect Of Mathematical Method. In Princeton University Press: United States of America (pp. 1–253). Princeton University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3609122?origin=crossref

Pramono, A. J. (2017). Aktivitas Metakognitif Siswa SMP dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Kemampuan Matematika. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 8(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v8i2.6703

Rafiqoh, S. (2020). Arah Kecenderungan dan Isu Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Sesuai Pembelajaran Abad 21 Untuk Menghadapi revolusi industri 4.0. Jurnal MathEducation Nusantara, 3(1), 58–73.

Rahmawati, K. D., & Kristiana, A. I. (2015). Analisis Kemampuan Metakognisi Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika Berbasis Polya Subpokok Bahasan PLSV Kelas VII-A SMP Negeri 3 Jember. ARTIKEL ILMIAH MAHASISWA, 1(1), 1–5.

Rambe, K. N., Sinaga, B., & Asmin, A. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Metakognisi dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematis pada Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar. Paradikma: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.24114/paradikma.v13i3.22912

Swartz, R. J., Perkins, D. N. (1990). Teaching Thinking Issues and Approaches. London: Routledge. 1-290.

Zakirman. (2017). Pengelompokan Gaya Belajar Mahasiswa Menurut Teori Honey Mumford Berdasarkan Intensitas Kunjungan Pustaka. Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 4(1), 1–6. http://jurnal.um-tapsel.ac.id/index.php/Ristekdik/article/view/221/199

Published
2024-09-06
Section
Articles