ANALYSIS OF ERRORS MADE BY MTS STUDENTS IN UNDERSTANDING MATHEMATICAL CONCEPTS BASED ON NOLTING’S THEORY

  • Namirayana Universitas Islam Negeri Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi, Indonesia
  • Rima Meslita Universitas Islam Negeri Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi, Indonesia
  • Della Amrina Yusra Universitas Islam Negeri Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi, Indonesia
Keywords: errors, nolting, understanding mathematical concept

Abstract

The aim of this study is to identify the types of errors and factors that cause the students's errors in solving questions about understanding mathematical concepts in the material of social arithmetic based on the Nolting Theory. This research is qualitative descriptive research. The data collection techniques used are description tests, observations, and semi-structured interviews. The researchers selected six students as the subjects of the study. The validity of the data used by the researchers is determined by a triangulation technique, that is, comparing the results of the student's mathematical test with the results of the interview. Based on the results of the analysis, the researchers revealed the types of mistakes made by the first hight category subject (ST1), the second high category subject (ST2), the first medium category subject (SS1), the second medium category subject (SS2), the first low category subjevt (SR1), and the second low category subject (SR2) are 1) on the type of misread-direction errors students do not read instructions on the subject due to hasty and unaccustomed reading instructions on the subject. 2) On the kind of careless errors students make in carrying out the calculations due to a lack of care, 3) On this type of conceptual error, the student does not understand concepts gross, tara, and net because of a lack of learning. 4) On application errors, students are unable to operate concepts related to discount in solving the issue due to an insufficient understanding of the material. 5) On type test-taking errors, pupils do not re-check answers due to being delayed and not accustomed to solving matters systematically, and 6) on type study errors Students do not spend enough time in studying the material of Arithmetic Social due to the lack of interest of the student in the material.

Tujuan dari penelitian ini, untuk mengetahui jenis-jenis kesalahan serta faktor-faktor penyebab kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal pemahaman konsep matematika dalam materi Aritmatika Sosial berdasarkan Teori Nolting. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif. Teknik pengumpulan data yang diterapkan meliputi tes esai, observasi, dan wawancara semi-terstruktur. Peneliti memilih enam siswa sebagai subjek penelitian. Untuk memastikan keabsahan data, peneliti menerapkan triangulasi teknik dengan membandingkan hasil tes matematika siswa dan hasil wawancara. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa kesalahan yang dilakukan oleh subjek penelitian dalam kategori tinggi pertama (ST1), kategori tinggi kedua (ST2), kategori sedang pertama (SS1), kategori sedang kedua (SS2), kategori rendah pertama (SR1), dan kategori rendah kedua (SR2) meliputi: 1) misread-direction errors, siswa tidak membaca petunjuk soal karena terburu-buru dan kurang terbiasa membaca petunjuk 2) careless errors, siswa melakukan kesalahan perhitungan akibat kurang teliti 3) concept errors, siswa tidak memahami konsep bruto, tara, dan netto karena kurang belajar 4) application errors, siswa tidak bisa mengaplikasikan konsep diskon dalam menyelesaikan soal akibat kurang memahami materi 5) test-talking errors, siswa tidak memeriksa kembali jawaban karena tergesa-gesa dan tidak terbiasa menyelesaikan soal secara sistematis dan 6) study errors, siswa tidak mengalokasikan waktu yang cukup untuk mempelajari materi Aritmatika Sosial akibat kurangnya minat pada materi tersebut.

References

Aledya, V. (2019). The Ability of Conceptual Understanding in Mathematics Among Students, 2(May), 0–7.

Amir, M. &. (2019). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Scaffolding terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Berdasarkan Self Efficacy Siswa SMP/MTs. JURING (Journal for Research in Mathematics Learning), 3(4), 367. https://doi.org/10.24014/juring.v3i4.10647

Apriyanti. (2021). Pengembangan Media Audiovisual Powtoon pada Pembelajaran Matematika untuk Siswa Sekolah Dasar. In JMPM: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika (Vol. 5, Issue 2, pp. 40–50). https://doi.org/10.26594/jmpm.v5i2.2084

Ariani, D. (2020). Millennial Ideas & Generation Z for Golden Indonesia. Fianosa Publishing.

Arikunto, S. (2010). Research procedure a practical approach. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 152, 21-28.

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications

Dila, O. R., & Zanthy, L. S. (2020). Identification of Students' Difficulties in Solving Social Arithmetic Problems. Teorema: Theory and Mathematical Research, 5(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.25157/teorema.v5i1.3036

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.

Gulvara, M. A., Suryadi, D., & Kurniawan, S. (2023). Student Errors in Solving Story Math Problems Based on Fong’s Schema: A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 6(2), 607–618. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v6i2.17141

Harefa, D., Sarumaha, M., Fau, A., Telaumbanua, T., Hulu, F., Telambanua, K., Sari Lase, I. P., Ndruru, M., & Marsa Ndraha, L. D. (2022). Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Belajar Siswa. Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal, 8(1), 325. https://doi.org/10.37905/aksara.8.1.325-332.2022

Insani, M. D., Nasrullah, A., & Bahri, S. (2024). Analisis Efektivitas Metode Problem Based Learning dalam Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Siswa SMP. Ulul Albab: Majalah Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram, 28(2), 64-76. https://doi.org/10.31764/jua.v28i2.23327.

Hidayat, A., & Nisa, R. (2019). Mathematics and Logical Reasoning. Bandung: MathLogic.

Kilpatrick, J. (2018). Understanding Mathematics Education. New York: Springer

Mardhiyah, R. H., Aldriani, S. N. F., Chitta, F., & Zulfikar, M. R. (2021). The importance of learning skills in the 21st century as a demand in human resource development. Lectura. Journal of Education, 12(1), 29-40.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2020). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage Publications.

Nolting, P. D. (2012). Math Study Skills Workbook: Your Guide to Reducing Test Anxiety and Improving Study Strategies (5th ed.).

Nolting, P. (2015). Math Study Skills Workbook. Boston: Cengage Learning

Nurmahdiyah, F., & Arliani, E. (2022). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Sma Kelas X Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Berbasis Kontekstual Pada Materi Fungsi Kuadrat. Jurnal Pedagogi Matematika, 9(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpm.v9i2.19602.

Nursanti, N., Hakim, F., & AR, R. A. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Terhadap Kemampuan Self-Concept Siswa SMP. Supermat: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 91-109. https://doi.org/10.33627/sm.v6i1.732.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. Sage Publications

Polya, G. (2019). How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. Princeton University Press.

Putra, P., Liriwati, F. Y., Tahrim, T., Syafrudin, S., Suhono, S., & Aslan, A. (2020). The Students Learning from Home Experiences during Covid-19 School Closures Policy In Indonesia. Jurnal Iqra’ : Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(2), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v5i2.1019.

Sari, N., & Rahman, N. (2018). Peningkatan Motivasi dan Kemampuan Kognitif IPA melalui Penerapan Model Cooperative Learning Tipe Jigsaw. PSEJ (Pancasakti Science Education Journal), 3(1), 34-42. https://doi.org/10.24905/psej.v3i1.880.

Setiani, N., Roza, Y., & Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika, P. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Siswa Dalam Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Materi Peluang Pada Siswa SMP. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 06(02), 2286–2297.

Skemp, R. R. (2017). The Psychology of Learning Mathematics. Routledge

Sugiyono. (2021). Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods (23rd ed.). Alfabeta, CV.

Syaputra, D. A., & Mulyono, H. (2021). Analysis of Students' Mathematical Problem Solving Ability in Lesson Study-Based Learning for Learning Community Based on Student Learning Style.

Ulpa, F., Marifah, S., Maharani, S. A., & Ratnaningsih, N. (2021). Analysis of Students’ Errors in Solving Contextual Problems in Solid Geometry Material Based on Nolting's Theory. Square: Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.21580/square.2021.3.2.8651

Zulfah, Astuti, Insani, S. U., Zulhendri, & Akbar, P. (2019). Development of Open-Ended Based Mathematics Problems to Measure High-Level Thinking Ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012047

Zulyanty, M. (2019). Newman Error Analysis Siswa Madrasah dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 379–388. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v3i2.121

Yudhanegara, K. E. L. D. M. R. (2018). Mathematics Education Research (3rd ed.). PT Refika Aditama.

Yunia, N., & Zanthy, L. S. (2020). Errors of Junior High School Students in Solving Story Problems in Social Arithmetic Material. Teorema: Theory and Mathematical Research, 5(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.25157/teorema.v5i1.3206

Published
2025-03-28
Section
Articles