IDENTIFICATION OF KNOWLEDGE OF PRE-SERVICES ELEMENTARY TEACHERS FOR TEACHING 3-DIMENSIONAL GEOMETRY

  • Nurain Suryadinata Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
  • Tina Yunarti Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
  • M Coesamin Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
Keywords: geometry three dimensional, pre-service elementary teachers, van hielle

Abstract

This study reports the results of the initial identification of the knowledge of prospective elementary school teachers related to learning three-dimensional (3D) geometry. A total of 32 students of the Elementary School Teacher Education (PGSD) study program were used as research subjects and given 15 questions related to van Hiele's geometric thinking level and related to the concepts of Teachers' Geometry Content Knowledge (GCK), Knowledge of Geometry and Students (KGS), and Knowledge of Geometry and Teaching (KGT). Data were analyzed descriptively using the percentage of correct answers in each question item. The study results showed that most of the prospective elementary school teachers who were the study subjects still had misconceptions about several three-dimensional geometry concepts, and the subjects of the study had not fully mastered the application of van Hiele's geometric thinking level in learning three-dimensional geometry.

Penelitian ini melaporkan hasil identifikasi awal terhadap pengetahuan calon guru sekolah dasar terkait pembelajaran geometri dimensi tiga (3D). Sebanyak 32 mahasiswa program studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar (PGSD) dijadikan subjek penelitian dan diberikan 15 pertanyaan yang dikaitkan dengan level berpikir geometri van Hiele, serta dikaitkan dengan konsep Teachers’ Geometry Content Knowledge (GCK), Knowledge of Geometry and Students (KGS), dan Knowledge of Geometry and Teaching (KGT). Data dianalisis secara deskriptif menggunakan persentase jawaban benar di setiap butir pertanyaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar mahasiswa calon guru sekolah dasar yang menjadi subjek penelitian masih mengalami miskonsepsi terhadap beberapa konsep geometri dimensi tiga, serta subjek penelitian tersebut belum menguasai sepenuhnya penerapan level berpikir geometri van Hiele dalam pembelajaran geometri dimensi tiga.

References

Armah, R. B., & Kissi, P. S. (2019). Use of the van Hiele Theory in Investigating Teaching Strategies used by College of Education Geometry Tutors. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103562

Bleeker, C., Stols, G., & Van Putten, S. (2013). The relationship between teachers’ instructional practices and their learners’ level of geometrical thinking. Perspectives in Education, 31(3), 66–78.

Browning, C., Edson, A. J., Kimani, P., & Aslan-Tutak, F. (2014). Mathematical Content Knowledge for Teaching Elementary Mathematics: A Focus on Geometry and Measurement. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(2), 333–383. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1306

Clements, S. R., O’Daffer, P. G., & Cooney, T. J. (1984). Geometry. Publishing Company.

Crowley, M. L. (1987). The van Hiele model of the development of geometric thought. In Learning and Teaching Geometry, K-12 (pp. 1–16).

Demir, E., İlhan, A., & Sevgi, S. (2023). Investigation of Seventh Grade Students van Hiele Geometric Thinking Levels in Circle Subject (Vol. 45, Issue 1).

Fauzi, A., & Haeriah, H. (2021). Kesulitan siswa sekolah dasar pada materi geometri bangun ruang ditinjau dari persepsi guru. Dikmat: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 17–23.

Fauzi, I., & Arisetyawan, A. (2020). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Siswa pada Materi Geometri Di Sekolah Dasar. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 11(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v11i1.20726

Hoffer, A. (1981). Geometry is more than proof. Mathematics Teacher, 74(1), 11–18.

Kandaga, T., Rosjanuardi, R., & Juandi, D. (2022). Epistemological Obstacle in Transformation Geometry Based on van Hiele’s Level. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(4), em2096. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11914

Lasmita, A. S., Margiati, & Nurhadi. (2014). Pengaruh Teori Belajar Van Hiele Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Peserta Didik di SD. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 3(7), 1–10.

Loewenberg Ball, D., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content Knowledge for Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554

Najwa, W. A. (2022). Identifikasi Tingkat Berpikir Geometri Mahasiswa Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar Berdasarkan Teori Van Hiele. Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Dan Karakter, 4(2), 43–50.

NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Novita, R., Prahmana, R. C. I., Fajri, N., & Putra, M. (2018). Penyebab kesulitan belajar geometri dimensi tiga. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v5i1.16836

Rafianti, I. (2016). Identifikasi Tahap Berpikir Geometri Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar Ditinjau dari Tahap Berpikir Van Hiele. JPPM, 9(2), 159–164.

Renanda, A., Qohar, A., & Chandra, T. J. (2023). Analisis Peningkatan Level Berpikir Geometri Mahasiswa Berdasarkan Teori Van Hiele dengan Pendekatan Konstruktivisme. Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 6(1), 101-114

Sasmita, I. G. A. A. L., Wirya, I. N., & Margunayasa, I. G. (2013). Pengaruh Teori Van Hiele dalam Pembelajaran Geometri Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas V SD di Desa Sinabun. Mimbar PGSD Undiksha, 1(1).

Sudihartinih, E., & Purniati, T. (2016). The Development Teaching Material of Analytic Geometry on the Conics Concept. Internasional Conference of Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education, Bandung, Indonesia.

Sulistiowati, D. L. (2022). Faktor Penyebab Kesulitan Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Geometri Materi Bangun Datar. BULLET: Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, 01(5), 941-951.

Published
2025-03-26
Section
Articles