STRENGTHENING THE MATHEMATICAL LITERACY THROUGH PROBLEM POSING LEARNING WITH A WORD PROBLEM THEME

  • Tomy Syafrudin Universitas Pesantren Tinggi Darul Ulum Jombang, Indonesia
  • Ciptianingsari Ayu Vitantri Universitas Pesantren Tinggi Darul Ulum Jombang, Indonesia
Keywords: mathematical literacy, problem posing, prospective teacher student, word problem

Abstract

Student mathematical literacy skills is depended teacher or prospective teacher skills to teach mathematical literacy. However, in reality, students' skills as prospective teachers in mathematical literacy are unable to do that. Therefore, a learning method is needed to facilitate the mathematical literacy skills of prospective teacher students. The aim of this research is to depict problem posing learning with a word problem theme that can strengthen the mathematical literacy skills of prospective teacher students. This qualitative research uses descriptive approach which conducted students on third and seventh grade of mathematics education study program for the 2023/2024 academic year. Validation sheet Observation sheets, response questionnaires, assignment sheet, and interview guide sheets are instrument for collecting data in this research. The results of the research show that the steps for learning problem posing with a word problem theme to strengthen students' mathematical literacy are consist of 2 steps. First; (1) choose a point, (2) List attribute to recall prior knowledge, (3) what -if-not-ing- to construct, (4) pose the problem, (5) analyze the problem, (6) communicate (7) emphasized by lecturer. Then second; (1) review, (2) project, (3) emphasized by lecturer. The second step is implemented for meeting after first step. The average validity percentage are 78% of the language content, 84% of mathematics content, and 80% of education content. The practicality of the design learning was 78,69%.

References

Alfino, B. Y., Rochsantiningsih, D., & Sulistyawati, H. (2019). Improving Students’ Class Participation By Optimizing The Use Of Think- Pair-Share Technique. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 22(2), 136–147. https://doi.org/10.20961/paedagogia.v22i2

Ampatuan, R. A., & Jose, A. E. S. (2016). Role Play As An Approach In Developing Students Communicative Competence. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 4(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol4.iss1.503

Basri, H., Kurnadi, B., Syarifuddin, Tafriliyanto, C. F., & Nugroho, P. B. (2021). Investigasi kemampuan numerasi mahasiswa calon guru matematika. Proximal: Jurnal Penelitian Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.30605/proximal.v4i2.1318

Brundiers, K., & A., W. (2013). Do we teach what we preach? An international comparison of problem- and project-based learning courses in sustainability. Sustainability, 5(4), 1725–1746. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5041725

Dhewy, R. C., & Ayuningtyas, N. (2019). Implementasi Pendekatan Problem Posing Soal Matematika PISA Likes terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Matematis. Vygotsky, 1(2), 87–98. https://jurnalpendidikan.unisla.ac.id/index.php/VoJ/article/download/136/136

Falach, H. N. (2016). Perbandingan Keefektifan Pendekatan Problem Solving dan Problem Posing dalam Pembelajaran Matematika pada Siswa SMP. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(3), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v11i2.10635

Geiger, V., Goos, M., & Forgasz, H. (2015). A rich interpretation of numeracy for the 21st century: A survey of the state of the field. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 47, 531–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0708-1

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B: EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3

Hsbollah, H. M., & Hassan, H. (2022). Creating Meaningful Learning Experiences With Active, Fun, And Technology Elements In The Problem-Based Learning Approach And Its Implications. Malaysian Journal of Learning & Instruction, 19(1), 147–181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2022.19.1.6

Indriani, S. (2016). Fostering Student Participation Through Interactive Teaching in Basic English Class. Scholaria : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 6(2), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.scholaria.2016.v6.i2.p92-99

J.S., K., & Shin, N. (2014). Project-Based Learning. In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. (pp. 275–297). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526.018

Jaramillo, M. G. . (2020). Mathematical Literacy: A Case Study Of Pre-Service Teachers [Southern Illinois University]. https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/dissertations/1798/

Joklitschke, J., Baumanns, L., & Rott, B. (2019). The intersection of problem posing and creativity: a review. In M. Nolte (Ed.), Including the Highly Gifted and Creative Students – Current Ideas and Future Directions. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mathematical Creativity and Giftedness (MCG 11), 59–67. https://mathedidaktik.uni-koeln.de/fileadmin/home/baumanns/MCG2019_Joklitschke-Baumanns-Rott.pdf

Juano, A., & Pardjono, P. (2016). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Problem Posing Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Kelas V SD. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 4(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v4i1.7801

Julie, H., Sanjaya, F., & Anggoro, Y. (2017). The Students’ Ability in Mathematical Literacy for Uncertainty Problems on the PISA Adaptation Test. AIP Conference Proceedings, 050026–1–050026–10. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995153

Lang, S. (1989). Faszination Mathematik – Ein Wissenschaftler stellt sich der Offentlichkeit. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag.

MacKeracher, D. (2004). Making sense of adult learning (2nd ed.). University of Toronto Press.

Madison, B. (2015). Quantitative literacy and the Common Core State Standards in mathematics. Numeracy, 8(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.8.1.11

Manan, M. H., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2018). Student’s Mathematics Conceptual Understanding: The Effect of Problem Posing Learning Assisted Visual Studio Applications. MATHEdunesa, 7(3), 659–662. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/mathedunesa/article/view/25951/23783

Molnár, G., & Greiff, S. (2013). Understanding transitions in complex problem-solving: Why we succeed and where we fail. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101408

Muneja, M. S. (2015). A Theoretical Basis for Adult Learning Facilitation: Review of Selected Articles. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(31), 54–61. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1083398.pdf

OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do – Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science (Volume I). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264201118-en

OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do – Student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Volume I, Revised ed.). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264208780-en

OECD. (2019). Future of Education and Skills 2030: A Series of Concept Notes. OECD Learning Compass. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/learning-compass-

Oktarina, D. (2025). Rahasia Mengingat Cepat dan Lama ala Prof. Stella Christie. RRI. https://rri.co.id/lain-lain/1236015/rahasia-mengingat-cepat-dan-lama-ala-prof-stella-christie

Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2013). An Introduction to Educational Design Research. https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/14472302/Introduction_20to_20education_20design_20research.pdf

Pratt, D. D. (1988). Andragogy as a relational construct. Adult Education Quarterly, 38(3), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001848188038003004

Riana, D., & Zenizela, Z. (2020). Kemampuan literasi matematis mahasiswa calon guru sekolah dasar. Konstruktivisme. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 12(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.35457/konstruk.v12i1.844

Robson, M. (2016). Action research: principles and practice. Taylor & Francis Journals, 13(3), 283–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2016.1220174

Sangco, A. P., Elpidang, M. E., & Sangco, R. M. R. (2022). The Impact of Problem Posing Strategies on Mathematical Performance, Ability, and Anxiety in Grade 7 Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 5(1), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.29103/mjml.v5i1.7423

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2020). Mathematical practices, in theory and practice. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52, 1163–1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01162-w

Sfard, A., & Kieran, C. (2001). Cognition as Communication: Rethinking Learning-by-Talking Through Multi-Faceted Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Interactions. MIND, CULTURE, AND ACTIVITY, 8(1), 42–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499944

Stacey, K. (2011). The PISA view of mathematical literacy in Indonesia. Journal on Mathematics Education, 2(2), 95–126. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.2.2.746.95-126

Stacey, K., & Turner, R. (2015). Assessing mathematical literacy: The PISA experience. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10121-7

Sugiharti, A., Vahlia, I., & Rahmawati, D. (2025). Pengembangan Aplikasi Android Berbasis Problem Based Learning Berorientasi Kebudayaan Lokal Materi Baris Dan Deret Aritmatika. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 409-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v14i2.10963

Tesfaye, S., & Berhanu, K. (2015). Improving students ’ participation in active learning methods : Group discussions , presentations and demonstrations : A case of Madda Walabu University Second Year Tourism Management Students of 2014. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(22), 29–33. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1079478.pdf

Tjernberg, C. C. (2023). Key factors for teaching and learning - Teachers’ experiences and reflections on literacy teaching. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2212915/v2

Towers, J., Andrews, H., Hall, J., Rapke, T., & Martin, L. C. (2017). Autobiographical Accounts of Students’ Experiences Learning Mathematics. Can. J. Sci. Math. Techn. Educ, 17, 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1241453

Ulusoy, F., & Kepceoğlu, İ. (2018). The contextual and cognitive structure of prospective middle school mathematics teachers’ problems in semi-structured problem-posing context. Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 19(3), 1937–1963. https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.2018.19.03.004

Ünlü, M., & Sarpkaya-aktaş, G. (2017). Examination of pre-service elementary mathematics teachers’ problems posed about algebraic expressions and equations. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 161–187. https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.303966

Van Harpen, X. Y., & Presmeg, N. C. (2013). An investigation of relationships between students’ mathematical problem-posing abilities and their mathematical content knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9456-0

Widjajant, K., Sarosa, M., & Selviana, V. (2023). Development of an E-Module on Derivative Applications for Vocational High School Students. JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika), 7(3), 793–804. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v7i4.15033

Wijaya, A. (2016). Students’ Information Literacy: A Perspective from Mathematical Literacy. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(2), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.7.2.3532.73-82

Published
2026-03-01
Section
Articles