Review Process
1. Preliminary Editorial Assessment
Every manuscript submitted to the Journal of English Education and Entrepreneurship is first examined by the editorial team to determine its relevance to the journal’s aims and scope. This initial assessment also considers the originality of the work, its scientific significance, the adequacy of the supporting data, and adherence to the journal’s author guidelines and formatting standards. Only manuscripts that satisfy these requirements will proceed to the review stage.
2. Peer-Review Procedure
The journal employs a double-blind review system, ensuring that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the evaluation process. Each submission is reviewed independently by a minimum of two experts whose academic backgrounds align with the subject matter of the manuscript.
Reviewers evaluate submissions based on criteria such as originality, scientific contribution, methodological soundness, relevance to biology education, and overall academic quality. They are required to disclose any conflicts of interest and to treat all manuscript materials as confidential documents.
3. Editorial Evaluation and Decision
Editorial decisions are made after careful consideration of reviewers’ comments and recommendations. Manuscripts may be accepted, returned to authors for revision, or declined for publication.
When revisions are requested, the updated manuscript may be reassessed by the editor and, when necessary, by the original reviewers before a final determination is reached. The Editor-in-Chief retains ultimate responsibility for publication decisions.
Authors of manuscripts not selected for publication will be informed accordingly and may receive an explanation regarding the reasons for the decision.
4. Appointment of Reviewers
Reviewers are chosen according to their scholarly expertise, research background, and publication experience related to the manuscript topic. During submission, authors may suggest potential reviewers and identify individuals they prefer not to review their work.
While such recommendations are taken into consideration, the editorial board independently selects reviewers and maintains full discretion over the appointment process. Any suggested reviewer with a potential conflict of interest will not be invited to participate.
5. Submission of Manuscripts
All manuscripts must be uploaded through the journal’s electronic submission platform available on the Bioedukasi e-journal website. Authors are required to create an account and submit their work using the Author role within the system.
The journal welcomes submissions in two categories:
- Original Research Articles
- Review Articles
For further information or technical support regarding manuscript submission, authors may contact the editorial office:
Email: [email protected]
Review Process:
All articles submitted to JEEP will be reviewed using the double-blind review method: the reviewer does not know the identity of the author, and the author does not know the identity of the reviewer. In general, each article is reviewed by one or two reviewers.
The reviewers' responses form the basis for the editor's decision, which will be one of the following:
Revisions required
Accept submission
Reject submission
An article may be rejected for publication due to the following considerations:
1) The article does not fit the journal's scope.
2) The article does not follow the rules for writing scientific papers or does not follow the author guidelines.
3) The manuscript contains fundamental methodological errors.
4) The manuscript shows indications of AI-generated content, with a plagiarism similarity score exceeding 30%.