Menata Bahasa, Merawat Keberagaman: Kajian Dokumen Rpph/Modul Ajar Paud Berbasis Bahasa Inklusif

  • Miratul Hayati Miratul Hayati UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
  • Nadylla Tri Sukmawati UIN Syarif Hidayatullah
Keywords: inclusive Language, lesson plan (RPPH), gender representation, anti-stereotyping, Developmentally Appropriate Practice (DAP), Universal Design for Learning (UDL)

Abstract

This study examines three PAUD (Early Childhood Education) Daily Lesson Plan/Teaching Module (RPPH/Modul Ajar) documents using an inclusive language lens to assess how curricular discourse promotes learning equity for young children. Qualitative document analysis with a thematic approach was employed, focusing on four analytical dimensions: gender representation and anti‑stereotyping practices; instructional tone and the degree of autonomy‑supportive language; the developmental appropriateness of scientific terminology for early language development; and differentiation strategies, including the application of Universal Design for Learning (UDL). The results show that several lesson plans continue to reproduce gender dichotomies, rely heavily on directive instructional formulations, and introduce abstract concepts without consistent multimodal scaffolding. In addition, UDL principles are not articulated explicitly, and accommodations for children requiring additional learning support or for multilingual learners remain limited. These findings align with previous studies on early childhood gender socialization, autonomy‑supportive pedagogy, Developmentally Appropriate Practice, and the contribution of UDL to inclusive learning. The study recommends revising curricular language to be more affirmative, developmentally responsive, and sensitive to children’s diversity, and systematically integrating UDL. As a practical contribution, this study provides concrete guidance for teachers and curriculum developers in Indonesia to design RPPH that are more inclusive, sensitive to diversity, and supportive of equitable learning from an early age.

References

Ackah-Jnr, F. R., Appiah, J., & Kwao, A. (2020). Inclusive language as a pedagogical and motivational tool in early childhood settings: Some observations. Online Submission, 8, 176–184.
Almeqdad, Q. I., Alodat, A. M., Alquraan, M. F., Mohaidat, M. A., & Al-Makhzoomy, A. K. (2023). The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2218191. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2218191
Arvanitis, A., Barrable, A., & Touloumakos, A. Κ. (2024). The relationship between autonomy support and structure in early childhood nature-based settings: Practices and challenges. Learning Environments Research, 27(1), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-023-09470-0
Azad, G. F., Marcus, S. C., & Mandell, D. S. (2021). Partners in School: Optimizing Communication between Parents and Teachers of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 31(4), 438–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2020.1830100
Children, N. A. for the E. of Y. (2020). Developmentally appropriate practice. Position Statement.
Crane-Deklerk, K. (2020). Multimodality in early childhood education. International Journal of Literacy, Culture, and Language Education, 1, 73–87.
Doucet, F., Badu, S., & DeVlieger, S. (2024). A critical discourse analysis of NAEYC’s developmentally appropriate practice texts: Shifting rhetoric and implications for advancing equity in family-school partnerships. International Journal of Early Years Education, 32(3), 658–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2024.2356148
Guo, P., & Wang, Z. (2025). Implementation fidelity of universal design for learning and effects on student achievement engagement and belonging. Scientific Reports. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-30079-1
Hadley, E. B., Barnes, E. M., & Hwang, H. (2023). Purposes, Places, and Participants: A Systematic Review of Teacher Language Practices and Child Oral Language Outcomes in Early Childhood Classrooms. Early Education and Development, 34(4), 862–884. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2022.2074203
Haen, A. C., Hardy, I., Saalbach, H., Leuchter, M., & Steffensky, M. (2025). Preschool Teachers’ Language Scaffolding in Early Science Education in Linguistically Heterogeneous Groups. In J. Ziehm-Eicher, M. Hasselhorn, & H.-G. Roßbach (Eds.), Kinder mit erhöhtem Risiko für Bildungsmisserfolg (Vol. 20, pp. 129–162). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-48674-7_5
Haris, F. I., Zaman, B., Kurniati, E., Apsari, N., Khoerunnisa, S., Sidqia, T. L., Shofia, A. F., & Hamid, A. I. (2025). Universal Design For Learning (UDL) Dalam Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Early Childhood Research Journal (ECRJ), 8(2), 248–257.
Hayati, M. (2025). Nada dan Kata yang Merangkul: Bahasa Inklusif dalam Lagu PAUD. AWLADY: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, 11(2), 70–85.
Hayati, M. (2026). Bahasa Inklusif Dan Kesejahteraan Emosional Anak: Tinjauan Psikolinguistik Dalam Konteks Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Jurnal Anak Usia Dini Holistik Integratif (AUDHI), 8(2), 107–116.
Ilyas, S. N., Musi, M. A., Bachtiar, A. M. Y., & Bakri, T. S. M. (2025). Reflective Pedagogy with Narrative and Visual Media for Enhancing Body Safety Awareness in Socioeconomically Marginalized Preschools. JTP-Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 27(2), 568–584.
Justicia, R., Dewi, F., Izza, M., Maulani, A. S., Putri, S. U., & Agustin, M. (2024). Pengembangan Digisafebook sebagai Media Interaktif untuk Pendidikan Keselamatan Seksual Anak Usia Dini. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 8(6), 1707–1716.
Kankam, D. A. (2025). Inclusive Education in a Diverse Language Class: Challenges and Best Practices. NECTFL Review, 94, 117–126.
Make, W. D. D. T. S. (n.d.). Preparing Equitable and Inclusive Early Childhood Educators: Three Evidence-Based Strategies. Retrieved February 21, 2026, from https://www.naeyc.org/resources/pubs/yc/spring2022/equity-teachers
Øyehaug, A. B., Kouns, M., & Savelsbergh, E. R. (2024). Teachers’ use of inquiry and language scaffolding questions when preparing an experiment. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 139–155.
Reeve, J. (2016). Autonomy-Supportive Teaching: What It Is, How to Do It. In W. C. Liu, J. C. K. Wang, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Building Autonomous Learners (pp. 129–152). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-630-0_7
Reeve, J., & Cheon, S. H. (2021). Autonomy-supportive teaching: Its malleability, benefits, and potential to improve educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 56(1), 54–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1862657
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68.
Solomon, J., & Henderson, B. (2016). Gender identity and expression in the early childhood classroom. YC Young Children, 71(3), 61.
Vizcarra-Garcia, J. (2021). Teachers’ perceptions of gender inclusive language in the classroom. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 4(3), 110–116.
Yang, D., Chen, P., Wang, H., Wang, K., & Huang, R. (2022). Teachers’ autonomy support and student engagement: A systematic literature review of longitudinal studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 925955.
Zhang, L., Carter, R. A., Greene, J. A., & Bernacki, M. L. (2024). Unraveling Challenges with the Implementation of Universal Design for Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09860-7
Zimmerman, K. N., Ledford, J. R., & Barton, E. E. (2017). Using Visual Activity Schedules for Young Children With Challenging Behavior. Journal of Early Intervention, 39(4), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815117725693
Published
2026-06-27